APRIL 2005

Why The Proposed .50 Caliber Ban Is Really A Rifle Ban:
By James O.E. Norell
April 5, 2005
The anti-gun Violence Policy Center is dishonestly branding the .50 caliber as a “terrorist” weapons, because it’s a hair’s breadth larger that other rifles. But their language reveals their true strategy: to ultimately ban all rifles as being “sniper rifles,” no matter the size. [More.]

Don't throw out the antivenom, just in case:
April 5, 2005
Picking and choosing which guns are acceptable under the Second Amendment is roughly as stupid as picking and choosing which books the First Amendment gives us the right to read. If we want to say that the Second Amendment is there to guarantee hunters the right to deer rifles, but not to so called "evil, scary assault rifles" because they're "dangerous to society," then we're setting an ominous precedent. [More.]

Only a .50 Caliber Ban, Don't You Believe It.
April 5, 2005
The .50 caliber is being dishonestly branded as a "terrorist" weapon, supposedly because it`s a hair`s breadth larger than other rifles. The anti-gunners` language reveals their true strategy: to ultimately ban all rifles, no matter their size. [More.]